Cycle BCL – Karen De Clercq (CNRS/LLF/Université Paris Cité) – NEG-TAM Interactions across the Globe: a case study of Bengali

Jeudi 28 novembre 2024 – à 10h30 – Salle 213 – BCL, Campus SJA 3
Abstract The aims of this talk are twofold. First, I will discuss an ongoing large-scale typological study on TAM- NEG interactions of the type illustrated by Alamblak in (1): while {fiñji} is the standard negator (SN) used in past and present tenses (1a), the suppletive marker {afë} is used in the context of the future tense, (1b) (Miestamo, 2005; Bruce, 1984).
  1. (1) a. fiñji yay- kah- r- m.
  2. NEG eat IRR.PRS 3SG.M 3PL
  3. ‘He is not eating them/does not eat them.’
  4. b. afë noh- rhw- a- t- r
  5. NEG.FUT die FUT PRESUPP IRR 3SG.M
  6. ‘He will not die’
I will discuss the typology of NEG-TAM interactions, and report on the methodology and first results of the project, which consists in an investigation of a balanced sample of 179 languages (Miestamo, 2005). Second, the talk will zoom in on an intricate case of NEG-TAM interactions in Bengali, and provide a nanosyntactic account for it. The Bengali facts to be accounted for are: 1) the distribution of the standard negator {na}, (2), and its perfect-conditioned allomorph {ni}, (3c); 2) the blocking of perfect morphology, i.e. e and ch(i) in (3a)-(3b), under {ni} (3c); 3) the neutralisation of the past {vs.} the present perfect under {ni}.
  1. (2) a. mach kha-i
  2. fish eat-1
  3. ‘I eat fish.’
  4. b. mach kha-i na
  5. fish eat-1 NEG
  6. ‘I do not eat fish.’ (Banerjee, 2021)
  7. (3) a. mach khe-e = ch-i
  8. fish eat-PRF=AUX-1
  9. ‘I have eaten fish.’
  10. b. mach khe-e = chi1-am
  11. fish eat-PRF=AUX-PST-1
  12. ‘I had eaten fish.’
  13. c. mach kha-i ni
  14. fish eat-1 NEG.PRF
  15. ‘I haven’t/hadn’t eaten fish.’
References Banerjee, Neil. 2021. Two ways to form a portmanteau: Evidence from ellipsis. In Patrick Farell (ed.), Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, vol. 6 1. 39–52. Bruce, Les. 1984. The Alamblak language of Papua New Guinea (East Sepik) (C 81). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard negation. The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Partager

Ça peut vous intéresser !

Actualités|Autres

Luisa Seguin (BCL) et ses collègues Naomi Nagy (University of Toronto), Jonathan R. Kasstan (University of Westminster)et Maria Polinsky (University

Soutenances
Inscrite au croisement de l’histoire et des humanités numériques, cette thèse analyse la fabrication des thématiques migratoires et identitaires dans
Actualités|Colloques et Journées

20th Comparative Italian Dialect Syntax-Morphology Meeting Nice (France), 23rd-25th September 2026 Campus Saint Jean d’Angély Building SJA3 – Salle Plate We are

Actualités

L’UMR Bases, Corpus, Langage a le grand plaisir d’annoncer l’élection de Seçkin ARSLAN à la Young Academy of Europe !  Cette prestigieuse reconnaissance vient