Accueil > Pages Perso > Céline Poudat

Céline Poudat

MCF -  UNS

Site personnel

http://poudat.fr

Dernières publicationsHAL

pour l'idHal "celine-poudat" :

titre
The CORLI Consortium: CORpus, Languages and Interaction
auteur
Christophe Parisse, Carole Etienne, Céline Poudat
article
Digital Humanities 2019, Jul 2019, Utrecht, Netherlands
annee_publi
2019
typdoc
Poster
Accès au bibtex
BibTex
titre
Désaccords et conflits dans le Wikipédia francophone
auteur
Céline Poudat, Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac
article
CORELA - COgnition, REprésentation, LAngage, CERLICO-Cercle Linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest (France), A paraître, Accord et non accord, 31
annee_publi
2019
typdoc
Article dans une revue
Accès au texte intégral et bibtex
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02048990/file/Poudat_HoDac_CERLICO_final_biblioRevisee.pdf BibTex
titre
Building community" at the national and/or international level in the context of the Digital Humanities
auteur
Adeline Joffres, Mike Priddy, Francesca Morselli, Thomas Lebarbé, Xavier Granier, Paul Bertrand, Xavier Rodier, Fabrice Melka, Jason Camlot, Stéfan Sinclair, Idmhand Fatiha, Caroline Abéla, Mehdi Chayani, Christophe Parisse, Céline Poudat, Véronique Ginouvès, Michael E. Sinatra, Emmanuel Chateau Dutier, Gimena del Rio Riande, Paula Ricaurte, Isabel Galina Russel, José Francisco Barron Tovar, Ernesto Priani Saiso, Martin Grandjean, Aurélien Berra, Olivier Baude, Stéphane Pouyllau
article
Digital Humanities, 2019, Utrecht, Netherlands
annee_publi
2019
resume
Knowledge production has always act globally, and when it comes to the humanities early networks of scholars can still be traced in their letter correspondence. With the emergence of digital humanities more prominently in the 1970s, research communities have organized themselves in many different ways. The enthusiasm generated by the promises of what was sometimes perceived as a "new field" were to some extent echoed in new forms of institutionalization, to the point of defining a discipline in its own right. But the enthusiasms was also accompanied by a certain resistance of communities reluctant to introduce digital technology into their field. The term of "digital humanities" in these earlier days of adopting digital methods into the humanities created an area, a niche, inside which pioneers in Digital Humanities could gain critical mass. Today, where digital methods are far more widely applied, one can observe an almost opposite trend, the abandoning of a ‘specific label’ and a much broader advocacy concerning all humanities. What remains specific for DH communities is the close alliance between content providers (which themselves are in a process of digitisation content and access), humanities scholars applying digital methods, and computer scientists linking to new methodological achievements in their field. However, this alliance can express itself in very different forms of national and international organisation, and is far from following a specific model. This panel examines different ways of "forming a community" among digital humanities scholars and scholars in other fields, and other actors in DH. The contributions span a range from generic ways to design digital research infrastructures in the SSH, over national solutions to supranational coordination. The purpose of this panel is to unfold the diversity of the current "digital humanist movement”, not only to compare, but also to understand what is at stake for the actors involved and what impact the different forms of organisation have on creation and evolution of research communities. We further discuss issues of cohesion and durability. Through the papers presented, we will examine the impact of bottom-up, top-down and horizontal strategies as well as the adoption of hybrid solutions (organizational, disciplinary, methodological, scalar) in the design of research communities. This approach will allow us to put convergences and challenges into perspective and to question the re- compositions at work within SSH communities. This panel will highlight the experiences of SSH research communities from different cultures and organizations rooted at different levels of governance, such as some French communities structured around institutional nodes such as Maisons des Sciences de l'Homme (MSH), or research infrastructures at the national (TGIR Huma-Num) or European level (DARIAH ERIC); project based collaboration of research infrastructures (DANS, The Netherlands) and Canada (CRIHN); and professional networks and transnational associations related to digital humanities (e.g. Humanistica, the French-speaking association of digital humanities, or the Latin American network for digital humanities under construction). The comparison of the experiences presented will not produce a homogeneous and smooth image but will highlight differences in approaches and organisation. Even it seems nearly impossible to give account of every association that could be representative on a way to build community in DH, the chair of the session will make an introduction with a brief summary of this landscape. That said, besides the geographical aspect that we try to include, another is that we are giving voice to formal and informal associations such as the LatamHD network, that is just at an early stage and that is not yet defined in its goals. We decided to propose several solutions to deal with the diversity of needs and practises inside our communities and we wanted to present some of them to share our experiences and initiate discussions during this panel in order to develop collaborations with colleagues sharing the same kind of constraints. Thus, the objective is to have a broad discussion with the audience to broaden the perspectives to other experiences. This panel aims to contribute to the reflective work in the wider DH context about factors of constitution, consolidation and evolution of its research communities.
typdoc
Communication dans un congrès
Accès au texte intégral et bibtex
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02182752/file/BuildingCommunity-2019.pdf BibTex
titre
Corpus DiscoWiki: Un corpus de Discussions Conflictuelles du Wikipédia francophone
auteur
Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac, Céline Poudat
article
Journée d'étude CORLI : Traitements et standardisation des corpus multimodaux et web 2.0., May 2018, Paris, France
annee_publi
2018
typdoc
Poster
Accès au texte intégral et bibtex
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01873824/file/poster_journeesCMC_TChanier_juin2018.pdf BibTex
titre
CORLI: A Linguistic Consortium for Corpus, Language and Interaction
auteur
Christophe Parisse, Céline Poudat, Ciara Wigham, Michel Jacobson, Loïc Liégeois
article
CLARIN Annual Conference 2017, Sep 2017, Budapest, Hungary
annee_publi
2017
typdoc
Communication dans un congrès
Accès au bibtex
BibTex
titre
Désaccords et conflits dans le Wikipédia francophone
auteur
Céline Poudat, Camille Bouzereau, Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac
article
Colloque CerLICO, « Accord, non accord et… désaccord », Jun 2017, Poitiers, France
annee_publi
2017
typdoc
Communication dans un congrès
Accès au bibtex
BibTex
titre
Closing a gap in the language resources landscape : Groundwork and best practices from projects on computer-mediated communication in four European countries.
auteur
Michael Beißwenger, Thierry Chanier, Isabella Chiari, Tomaž Erjavec, Darja Fišer, Axel Herold, Nikola Ljubešić, Harald Lüngen, Céline Poudat, Egon Stemle, Angelika Storrer, Ciara Wigham
article
CLARIN Annual Conference 2016, Oct 2016, Aix-en-Provence, France. 136, ⟨Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings⟩, pp.1-19, 2017, Selected papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2016, 978-91-7685-499-0
annee_publi
2017
resume
The paper presents best practices and results from projects in four countries dedicated to the creation of corpora of computer-mediated communication and social media interactions (CMC). Even though there are still many open issues related to building and annotating corpora of that type, there already exists a range of accessible solutions which have been tested in projects and which may serve as a starting point for a more precise discussion of how future standards for CMC corpora may (and should) be shaped like.
typdoc
Direction d'ouvrage, Proceedings, Dossier
Accès au texte intégral et bibtex
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01379621/file/CLARIN2016-cmccorpora-rev-final.pdf BibTex
titre
Explorer un corpus textuel
auteur
Céline Poudat, Frédéric Landragin
article
De Boeck, pp.240, 2017, Champs linguistiques, 978-2807305632
annee_publi
2017
resume
Avec le virage numérique, les pratiques du linguiste ont sensiblement évolué. Décrire des discours et des usages ou mettre en évidence des phénomènes linguistiques particuliers passe de plus en plus par l’exploitation de corpus numériques pour mettre à l’épreuve ses hypothèses.Cette pratique fait appel à de nombreux procédés, pour lesquels des repères méthodologiques s’avèrent indispensables : quelle méthode choisir pour quel objectif de recherche ? Pourquoi annoter un corpus ? Comment mettre au jour sa structure, ou dégager ses spécificités ? Quels sont les outils mobilisables ? L’originalité de cet ouvrage est de proposer à l’analyste, de manière pratique et située, un ensemble de repères méthodologiques en lien avec les usages et les outils d’exploration de corpus les plus mobilisés dans le champ linguistique français. Il s’appuie sur un contexte institutionnel et des réflexions collectives menées dans le cadre d’un groupe de travail sur l’exploration de corpus et balise les méthodes présentées d’exemples concrets de recherches et d’outils exploitables.
typdoc
Ouvrage (y compris édition critique et traduction)
Accès au bibtex
BibTex
titre
Exploring Wikipedia talk pages for conflict detection
auteur
Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac, Veronika Laippala, Céline Poudat, Ludovic Tanguy
article
Darja Fišer and Michael Beißwenger. Investigating Computer-Mediated Communication: Corpus-Based Approaches to Language in the Digital World, ⟨Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts⟩, pp.146-168, 2017, Translation Studies and Applied Linguistics, 978-961-237-961-2. ⟨10.4312/9789612379612⟩
annee_publi
2017
resume
The present study concentrates on Wikipedia talk pages, which are online discussions where the authors discuss the composition and content of Wikipedia articles. These pages provide new data for describing and analysing collaborative writing processes, which often involve conflicts. Previously, many studies have explored Wikipedia conflicts, highlighting opposite editing patterns in relation to cooperation, conflicts or quality. Most of these studies belong to the field of social sciences, and linguistic analyses are not very common in this context. Therefore, the linguistic characteristics of Wikipedia conflicts in talk pages are still little described in the literature. In this context, our objective is to analyse relevant linguistic cues which may help identify and characterize conflicts on Wikipedia talk pages. To this end, we apply two automatic methods. The first consists of the supervised automatic classification of conflicting vs. harmonic discussion threads. Secondly, we apply multidimensional analysis to the data to help profile the Wikipedia talk genre, enabling us to highlight key features and oppositions at a global level. The analyses are carried out on the WikiTalk corpus, a resource based on the French Wikipedia talk pages (160M words, 3M posts, 1M threads). The corpus includes a wide range of metadata, providing extra-linguistic characterization of the Wikipedia discussions.
typdoc
Chapitre d'ouvrage
Accès au bibtex
BibTex
titre
Connecting Resources: Which Issues Have to be Solved to Integrate CMC Corpora from Heterogeneous Sources and for Different Languages?
auteur
Michael Beißwenger, Ciara Wigham, Carole Etienne, Darja Fišer, Holger Grumt Suárez, Laura Herzberg, Erhard Hinrichs, Tobias Horsmann, Natali Karlova-Bourbonus, Lothar Lemnitzer, Julien Longhi, Harald Lüngen, Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac, Christophe Parisse, Céline Poudat, Thomas Schmidt, Egon Stemle, Angelika Storrer, Torsten Zesch
article
5th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities (cmccorpora17), Oct 2017, Bolzano, Italy. pp.52-55
annee_publi
2017
resume
The paper reports on the results of a scientific colloquium dedicated to the creation of standards and best practices which are needed to facilitate the integration of language resources for CMC stemming from different origins and the linguistic analysis of CMC phenomena in different languages and genres. The key issue to be solved is that of interoperability-with respect to the structural representation of CMC genres, linguistic annotations metadata, and anonymization/pseudonymization schemas. The objective of the paper is to convince more projects to partake in a discussion about standards for CMC corpora and for the creation of a CMC corpus infrastructure across languages and genres. In view of the broad range of corpus projects which are currently underway all over Europe, there is a great window of opportunity for the creation of standards in a bottom-up approach.
typdoc
Communication dans un congrès
Accès au texte intégral et bibtex
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01918880/file/cmc-corpora_2017_paper_28.pdf BibTex
  • + de résultats dans la Collection HAL du laboratoire BCL
  • Voir l'ensemble des résultats sur la plateforme HAL